HOME

Wednesday April 26 2017

William Peraldus' Summa , c. 1255–1265.

The theory of the trinity as taught by theologians who influenced the roman catholic church formed under the roman emperor Constantine  is unbiblical & utterly ridiculous.  What makes it even worse is that  the protestant movement which broke away from the Roman Catholic 'Church' because of the latter's totally corrupt state- of- affairs continued to embrace this theory even after leaving it and continues to this day. Reminds me of how the Israelites did not heed Yahweh's call to rid the promise land of pagan worshipers and continues to suffer from it to this day. 'Not only is the trinity teaching it unbiblical, it is totally irrelevant for salvation, evangelism and your personal walk with Yahweh God. I know this to be a fact because I am speaking from my personal experience, which is what this site is all about. I have also interviewed fellow Believers & the consensus is the same - nothing of value will be lost if you do not believe  in the trinity theory and yet it is central to the christian's faith as taught in most Protestant churches today. But how did you come to believe in it in the first place ? The way I believed it :

1. I didnt come across anyone  in the congregation I belonged to that did not believe in the trinity theory . There wasnt any discussion about it and everyone just seemed to embrace it . I was a new born bane and though the elders should know better.

2.  there were passages in scripture which seem to support this theory . For me, it was John 1 1-14 - doesnt it clearly state that " In the beginning was the Word, & the Word was God and that the Word became flesh & dwelt among man ? Slam dunk !

3. there were analogies  that explained this difficult-to -understand- theory . Personally, I was sold on the  analogies that water, ice & vapor are all different yet are one and that a man can be a father, husband & son at the same time .

Credits : the trinity delusion

It all seemed good and proper and there was no need for me to question it , until I was led to do a research on the trinity idea some years ago. Here's why the 3 points that led me to believe in the trinity dont cut :

1. This is a logical fallacy called argumentum ad numerum, which asserts that the more people who support or believe a proposition, the more likely it is that that proposition should be true. But just as something true does not become untrue if no one believes in it, something that is not true will not become true if more people believed in it. Truth cannot be attained through the consensus of the majority. The Earth was never flat even if the whole world believed so.

2. ALL the passages of Scripture which trinitarian theologians and their flock have used  to substantiate the trinity theory have been digested through exegesis, and found to be false. . Exegesis is a theological term used to describe an approach to interpreting a passage in Scripture by critical analysis. Proper exegesis includes using the context around the passage, comparing it with other parts of Scripture, and applying an understanding of the language and customs at the time of the writing, in an attempt to clearly understand what the original writer intended to convey. In other words, it is trying to "pull out" of the passage the meaning inherent in it. Not using this method will result in a doctrine of loopholes which is what the doctrine of the trinity is all about. The main objective of this site, to give a proper rebuttal to these 'trinitarian' verses and explain what they actually mean .The passage in John 1 : 1-14 is explained here, dispelling all ideas about the trinity theory .

3.


Thanks to the brilliant work of many saints  who have written and exposed it on the Internet, my own research and grace to see through error given by the Spirit of our loving God Yahweh, I was finally freed from this senseless theory and am now able to share this with you, in the hope you too will benefit, just as I have benefited from others  .
Discarding this belief which you came to accept as 'christian' after many years is not going to be easy, but it can be achieved. The first thing to know is that we are reminded that many will come to pervert the truth, even from among our own. Hence we  called to test everything and to prove ourselves. The emphasis here is that you have to prove yourself, meaning , you will have to "check it out" and not rely on someone else to check it out for you. Arm yourself with a willingness to learn, using the sword of the Spirit which is the Word of Yahweh God, & ask for grace & discernment from the Spirit of Yahweh God to lead & guide you. It will take awhile, but I can tell you that nothing can be more rewarding than being set free from error - besides, it can be thrilling to play Sherlock Holms !

Because the trinity theory is based on poor scholarship, we should stop giving it the prestige & recognition as a 'doctrine'. This nonsensical theory has been given too much respect by too many people for far too long. This so called 'doctrine' is nothing but gobbledegook. It is the equivalent of the 'spiritual' Piltdown Man which was one of the greatest scientific hoax ever perpetrated by learned men.

That the Trinity doctrine was constructed not out of a desire to understand God, but rather as part of a a vendetta against heresies (i.e. first Arianism, then Macedonianism), is what makes it as nonsensical as it seems. It was not designed as a rational theology and was never intended to be one; it was designed specifically, and only, to refute other theologies and to exclude those who adhered to them.


Does Christianity even require the trinity? In my opinion, no it doesn’t. I am not a biblical scholar, but it seems that deriving the doctrine of the trinity from the Biblical texts requires some mental and theological gymnastics. Besides the polytheistic/Henotheistic/Monolatrist vibes one gets from many Old Testament passages, the rest is extremely monotheistic, and there are no hints that Yahweh is actually three entities. The doctrine of the trinity isn’t even implicitly taught in the New Testament, but rather seems to be a poorly constructed doctrine based on a few scattered verses mentioning the spirit of God, various passages from John and Paul’s writings that allude to the supposed divinity of Jesus, and some of the polytheistic references from the Old Testament. The only time they are all mentioned at once as far as I know is in the prescription of the Rite of Baptism, which I suspect may even be a later interpolation.

As many will be aware, some early sects of the Christian cult were not even Trinitarian, and the primary reason that most denominations today are, is because this was the position of the various Catholic councils that deemed other views heretical. Some examples of other views are the Modal view of God, where the Father, Son and Holy Spirit were just different ‘modes’ of God, or expressions. In this view, the deity was still very much singular. Other views included ones where Jesus was either not human, or not divine such as Arianism (Do not confuse this with Aryanism).

What does the trinity even bring to the religion? Nothing. What doctrines are illuminated by God being split into three personalities? Why would an infinite deity require being composed of 3 parts? It is questions like these remaining almost entirely unanswered that makes me more certain that the religion is of purely human origin. Doctrines were invented whimsically to try to explain ideas, but instead they only serve to confuse. Apparently the god of the Bible is the author of the confusion, because the god of the bible is mankind.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------